近日,“15岁女孩偷卖家中奢侈品”一事,引发关注。
据湖南都市频道风芒新闻2月23日报道,湖南长沙15岁少女贱卖家中贵重物品换新手机,总价值13万的手表、包包等奢侈品,仅卖了9300元。
A 15-year-old girl in Changsha, Hunan province, has sparked public debate after selling luxury items from her family home to a secondhand store at a steep discount. The girl is reported to have sold the goods with the aim of making enough money to buy a new smartphone.
![]()
对此,女孩家长丁女士表示震惊与愤怒,“对于对方是否是未成年人,(奢侈品回收平台)没有进行审核把关。”
The items, including watches and designer bags worth about 130,000 yuan, were reportedly sold for just 9,300 yuan. The girl's mother, surnamed Ding, said the stop failed to verify the seller's age.
涉事门店工作人员则称回收价并非9300元,但拒绝透露具体金额。
据九派新闻消息,长沙芙蓉区市场监督管理局工作人员表示,相关科室已关注到此事,正在进一步了解具体情况。
涉事门店在社交平台上显示已暂停营业,一工作人员称24日已没有营业。
Shop staff disputed the reported price but declined to disclose the actual amount. Local regulators in Furong district said the case is under investigation, and the store had suspended operations as of Tuesday.
律师:15岁属限制民事行为能力人
回收平台负有审核义务
河南泽槿律师事务所主任付建认为15岁女孩属于限制民事行为能力人,对其在二手平台所售的高价奢侈品的真实价值超出认知水平,与其年龄、智力和精神健康状况并不相适应,属于效力待定的买卖合同,因监护人拒绝追认不产生法律效力。
Fu Jian, a lawyer at a Henan-based law firm, said a 15-year-old is considered to have limited civil capacity under Chinese law, meaning transactions involving high-value items may be invalid without guardian approval.
《民法典》第157条规定民事法律行为无效、被撤销或者确定不发生效力后,行为人因该行为取得的财产,应当予以返还;不能返还或者没有必要返还的,应当折价补偿。有过错的一方应当赔偿对方由此所受到的损失;各方都有过错的,应当各自承担相应的责任。法律另有规定的,依照其规定。
回收平台负有审核义务,如果其审核机制并不完善,依据流程不能核实卖方身份的,具有过错;监护人未对孩子履行谨慎的监护义务,对损害结果发生也具有过错。监护人可以追回孩子处分的财物,奢侈品已被转售、毁损或灭失无法返还,则应按市场价值进行折价补偿,交易中产生的损失可根据双方过错程度各自分担部分损失。
Under China's Civil Code, property obtained through invalid transactions must be returned or compensated at market value if restitution is impossible. Fu added that stores are responsible for verifying sellers' identities, while guardians may also bear responsibility if supervision is inadequate.
![]()
图源:湖南都市频道风芒新闻视频截图
“未成年人贱卖家中物品”时有发生
一地消保委出手:交易无效
中青报记者注意到,事实上,未成年人偷偷贱卖家中物品,并非个例。
据河南广电民生频道2025年10月15日报道,河南10岁男孩偷偷卖掉姥姥的黄金吊坠,13克黄金卖了4200元。
![]()
不久前,“11岁女孩偷卖家长黄金”的消息,也登上微博热搜。浙江绍兴张先生家里的黄金项链、耳环足足20多克,被孩子拆成6次偷卖到金店,换了16000多元。
![]()
无独有偶,赵先生家祖传的6个银手镯,被13岁的儿子偷卖,部分银手镯已被商家熔掉。收到相关投诉后,绍兴柯桥区消保委迅速介入,判定这些交易通通无效,家长退还回收所得款项,商家在退还部分首饰原物的同时,余下已熔毁饰品换成同克重饰品退回。
Similar cases have been reported in recent years, with minors secretly selling family jewelry without parental consent. In one case in Shaoxing, Zhejiang province, disputed transactions were ruled invalid, requiring merchants to return the items or provide replacements.
“两个案例中,两名未成年人作为限制民事行为能力人,多次出售家庭大宗贵重物品,明显超出其行为能力范畴,监护人拒绝追认,交易应属无效。金店、首饰店作为专业经营者,在明知交易对象是未成年人的情况下,未核实监护人同意、评估交易适当性,存在明显过错。同时,家长未能妥善保管财物并履行监护职责,亦是事件发生的重要因素,因而双方均需承担相应责任。”
![]()
据统计,一年内当地已受理类似投诉36起,涉事者年龄最小11周岁,涉及金额最高超过18000元。
Local consumer officials said dozens of similar complaints were recorded last year, with some cases involving children as young as 11 and raising concerns over verification standards in secondhand trading and parental supervision.
来源:中国青年报 湖南都市频道风芒新闻 九派新闻 河南广电民生频道 越牛新闻客户端 绍兴晚报
跟着China Daily
精读英语新闻
“无痛”学英语,每天20分钟就够!
![]()
特别声明:以上内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)为自媒体平台“网易号”用户上传并发布,本平台仅提供信息存储服务。
Notice: The content above (including the pictures and videos if any) is uploaded and posted by a user of NetEase Hao, which is a social media platform and only provides information storage services.