SAP License：未分配差异新解

没有被分摊的四个原因

一. 库存覆盖范围检查

CKMLPP-PBPOPO 收据: 期间中后继调整的数量 > 累计库存数量，如果依然想把这部分差异分摊，那么在 CKMVFM里将价格限制逻辑去掉

Base quantity for stock coverage check, that is cumulated from all operations that result in a value-only posting
without quantity (forexample material debits/credits, subsequent adjustments from invoices or ac_countmaintenance).

If no stock coverage is given, the Not Distributed line appears in the material price analysis.

比如MR22/采购订单后续差异输入/生产订单结算，实际上是不影响库存数量的，但是调整时可以输入一个数量，如果这个调整数量>累计的库存数量，那么他们的差异数量（调整数量-库存数量）部分的差异价值就会被放在”没有被分摊“中在CKMLCP的单层价格确定参数里，可以将”不含库存覆盖范围检查的价格确定“勾上。

If you set this indicator, then there is

no stock coverage check for single-level price determination.

可能会引起价格突变，最好是先不勾上，分析原因是否合理，排除错误因素后，再勾上运行！

二.避免PUP为负

fallback strategy：”Automatic Error Correction by the System”

As a solution, you might check the postings of these materials if they really need to have such big negative price
differences or if there is some kind of error in the posting or the production structure. If you find such errors, you might
reverse the corresponding postings and post them in a correct way.

Or, you might use transaction MR22 (debit/credit material) in order to post an appropriate positive amount of differences
to the concerned materials so that the resulting actual price would no longer be negative. This allows to perform the
period closing regularly. In the next period, you might remove this manual posted value from the materials (again with
MR22) in order to correct the overall stock values back to their original amounts. （如果负差异很大为正常情况，可以考虑
用MR22输入一个正差异调整，下月再用MR22输入一个负差异调整回来）

(一） Fallback strategy when price is negative (one-way step)

It following cases
a.that the quantity of the “cumulative inventory” is zero,
b.or that the price determined is negative. For example, because a very large credit is posted into category
“Other receipts/consumption”.
In these cases the system cannot determine a price or it cannot determine an allowed price. The system therefore
must use another calculation line instead of the cumulative inventory. This usage of another calculation line is called
“fallback strategy”. In this case you have the following levels:

1. First, the system uses category “Receipts” as the calculation line. In this case the system generates message: C+135.

2. If the price based on the receipt quantity is also negative or if the receipt quantity is zero, the system uses category
“beginning inventory” as the calculation line. In this case the system generates message: C+138.

3. If the price based on the beginning inventory is also negative or if the beginning inventory quantity is zero, the system
uses the periodic unit price of the previous period as the new price. In this case the system generates message: C+136.

4. If the material for the previous period did not yet have any periodic unit price, the system uses the standard price of
the current period as the new periodic unit price. In this case the system generates message: C+137.
如果期初库存为负，累计差异=期初差异+本期收据差异*（本期累计数量/本期收据数量）,然后PUP=（累计标准价值+累计差异
）/累计数量

（二）Fallback strategy when price is negative (cycle)

The system issues error message C+723 and uses a fallback strategy.

Here the following messages can be generated:

CKMLMV034:

Cycle &1 will be recosted with the reduced actual BOM

If the price of a material that is in a cycle becomes negative, the fallback strategy described above cannot be carried out.
As an automatic fallback solution, all input materials that are also cycle materials are ignored.

（三）Fallback strategy when value exceeds threshold (for one-way step)

Here the following messages can be generated:

CKMLMV020:

Step &1: Packet & 2 is first costed with the actual BOM

CKMLMV018:

Step &1: Packet & 2 costed again with a reduced BOM

CKMLMV021:

Multilevel price determination with a reduced actual BOM

（四）Fallback strategy when value exceeds threshold (for cycle)

Here the following messages can be generated:

CKMLMV020:

Step &1: Packet & 2 is first costed with the actual BOM

CKMLMV018:

Step &1: Packet & 2 costed again with a reduced BOM

CKMLMV021:

Multilevel price determination with a reduced actual BOM

（五）Fallback strategy when cycle does not converge

Here the following messages can be generated:

CKMLMV005:

Cycle &1 broken off after &2 repititions

CKMLMV012:

Input material & 1 will be removed for the iteration (process &2)

三. 执行了CKMM.

When transaction CKMM is processed the system deletes the price differences for the material in the period and these
differences are not longer in the period record tables. CKMM会将差异删除，这些差异将不再被记录到物料分类帐记帐表里，
放在了CKM3的没有被分摊里，这是CKM3显示错误，因为显示在CKM3里的“没有被分摊”在期间里是没有记录的了。

The fact is that the price differences are still visible in CKM3 (as not distributed). This is due to the missing reset of
summarization records (MLCD).

This error is just a problem of CKM3 display, because the differences shown as ‘not distributed’ do not exist in the periodic

records. The PUPof the material is calculated correctly.

See note 384553 for further details.（46C）

The error is solved with note 838989:

(Hotpackage 46C SAPKH46C51

470 SAPKH47025

500 SAPKH50010

600 SAPKH60001).

假设上线时，材差科目有很多余额，这些差异并未显示到CKM3里,要用MR22来初始化差异!

四. 价格修改结果 (LTPC).

In transaction CKM3 when a subsequent price change (LTPC) is carried out, the preliminary valuation and all differences
are rescaled at category level. Additionally, the corresponding lines for price change documents are sorted and flagged
with the text “Subsequent price change”.

If a late price change is run with transaction MR21 and there were not a previous reversal of the consumptions already
posted in the period, these documents cannot be rescaled by transaction MR21.

Therefore transaction CKM3 will show a “Not distributed line” although the PRDs are rescaled correctly. This is then a
display side-effect in CKM3.

不包括原因

A）多层结算未运行

检查物料状态，重新运行多层结算

订单未收货 (有输入和输出物料的业务才能将多层差异分配出去)

联产品未收货(主产品的物料主数据里维护了分摊比例，而联产品没有收货，因为ML是按主数据里的比例结转差异的，找不到联产品的收货，那联产品应承担的那部份从下层结转来的差异，就会留在下层物料的不包括中，要将主产品物料主数据中的联产品分摊比例中的联产品比例改为0，联产品就不接收差异了)

B）没有运行消耗重估

4.7以后 激活Financials Extensions CKMLCP里就有消耗重估了 (物料转为费用的那部分差异分配出去)

C）WIP 重估没有运行

· The material ledger is active.

· Actual Costing is active. This enables you to revaluate WIP materials at actual prices.

· To be able to revaluate WIP activities at actual prices in ML instead of in OBJ, the following setting must be made:
In Customizing under Controlling ? Product Cost Controlling ? Actual Costing/Material Ledger ? Actual Costing ? Activate
Actual Costing, set the activity _updateindicator to 2 (Activity _updateRelevant to Price Determination).

· Activating WIP Revaluation

SAP相关产品：

SAP GRC权限合规检查系统（简称AMS-R系统）是SAP ERP应用企业进行权限合规检查、违规数据抓取和IT审计的理想工具。

AMS-V SAP License 资产优化管理系统产品：是应用于SAP系统权限风险控制及注册用户账号管理为目标的SAP软件资产精益化管理方案。

SAP 日志堡垒机安全管理系统（简称AMS-L系统）是一款面向SAP ERP 系统的网络安全管理工具，提供基于SAP系统用户业务行为的常态化监管，是对SAP现有日志体系的有效增强管理。

SAP 运维管理平台系统（简称AMS-Ops）旨在确保企业SAP应用系统健康、稳定运行的基础上，持续性的改进、优化，从而满足其业务发展需要的企业级SAP系统运维管理服务。

AMS SAP 商超订单统一管理系统以商超平台订单集中管理为核心，系统支持多平台、多店铺、全渠道系统采购订单、验收单、结算单等业务单据的统一管理；商超订单统一管理系统支持与 SAP ERP 系统的无缝衔接，在SAP ERP系统中自动生成销售订单、外向交货单，核对验收单、结算单等 SD 模块业务操作，有效的简化企业商超订单管理工作流程，保证订单数据处理的统一、准确、高效，实现跨系统、组织的协同管理，提升企业营销效率。

关于赛锐信息

河南赛锐信息科技有限公司（简称“赛锐信息”）是一家致力于SAP ERP系统应用的服务商，公司立足打造基于AMS产品套件的企业信息化解决方案，结合前沿技术追求最佳用户体验、企业信息化优秀解决方案和企业级产品应用的供应商。公司自主研发的AMS系列软件产品是国内首个用于SAP权限风险识别的增强系统，也是同行业用户精益化管理解决方案中最优的解决方案，作为用户管理、风险规避和信息审计的辅助工具，其有助于规范企业的管理行为，帮助建立合规的管控流程，有效提高企业IT资产投资回报率；AMS系列产品在各项技术指标上拥有完全的、独立的领先优势，可以满足市场竞争、技术许可和标准制定等方面的需要。

作者：SAP权限管理 QQ:2651000673