AI照片拿摄影比赛第一名？最新回应

11日，话题“AI照片竟然拿了摄影比赛第一名”冲上热搜第一。

An AI-generated image has been stripped of first prize in a photography contest organized by a high-end hotel brand after netizens identified clear signs of artificial intelligence manipulation, reigniting debate over AI's role in creative competitions.

近日，有网友发帖称，华住高端酒店品牌举办的摄影大赛，获得第一名的作品，拉曝光再放大看竟然是一张AI图！该摄影大赛还请了5位专业评委给作品打分，评委中还不乏一些协会副会长等大咖。

Online posts alleged that the winning entry in a photography contest held by H World Group was not a genuine photograph but an AI-generated image.

第42号作品《骑楼旧光》

根据该网友所说，记者找到该比赛第42号作品《骑楼旧光》原图，将亮度调大并将曝光调到过量曝光，明显看到图片右侧的数个牌匾出现字体错乱和字体生成不全。

该网友称，这是Al生成图片的常见错误，一眼就可辨别图片是AI生成的。还有其他例如老人提鸟笼的手指跟手掌连不起来、左侧连续两个凉茶铺牌匾之类的露馅细节。

The disputed work, Entry No 42, was initially awarded first place in the contest, which was judged by five professionals from national and municipal photography and fine arts associations.

According to a netizen who examined the image, adjusting brightness and exposure revealed typical AI flaws, including distorted characters on shop signs, unnatural finger details, and duplicated storefronts.

调高曝光后的《骑楼时光》

另据帖子信息，记者搜索到这项名为“艺术MaxX·城市记忆摄影大赛”的比赛，在华住会旗下上海东方美仑美奂酒店和华住美好家族官方公众号均有宣传。

此前第一名结果公示

记者查看获奖公示信息发现，该作品位于综合奖项第一名，第二名为作品《陆家嘴》，摄影比赛评委由“中国摄影家协会会员”“上海市美术家协会会员”等专业评委共5人组成。

据了解，该赛事公示日期为1月6日至1月10日23时59分，公示文件现已被删除。1月10日，上海外滩东方美仑美奂等多家酒店公众号公布了最终比赛结果，称比赛公示期已结束。

值得注意的是，最终获奖名单中，此前公示文件中的第二名已变更为第一名。

The work was listed as first place during the public notice period from Tuesday to Saturday, which has since been removed. When the final results were released on Saturday, the former second-place entry was promoted to first place.

11日下午，封面新闻记者致电华住会客服，了解取消原因及后续处理情况。客服回应称：“经过内部多方核查，作品不符合原创性规则，经和投稿人沟通后取消了成绩。最终结果以公示为准。”

A H World customer service representative told reporters on Sunday that the award was revoked after internal reviews found the work violated originality requirements, adding that the decision followed communication with the submitter.

去年底，福建省旅游发展集团主办的摄影大赛一等奖作品《湖秋雾影》被网友质疑为AI生成，同样引发热议。

有AIGC专业人士分析，该图片中树叶的纹理和颜色过渡均匀，未能体现出真实照片中因光照、视角等因素导致的细微差异，整体细节呈现出一种“过度平滑”的质感。这些特征表明，此图片极有可能是由AI生成的。

A similar controversy emerged late last year when a first-prize entry in a Fujian Tourism Development Group photography contest, was also suspected of being AI-generated. Experts note that such images often exhibit overly smooth textures and uniform color transitions, unlike real photographs.

北京市隆安律师事务所高级合伙人李长青曾表示，赛事规则明确禁止AI作品参赛，参赛者报名即视为同意该条款，其提交AI生成作品的行为构成违约。主办方有权取消其一等奖资格；若赛事规则中已明确规定承担相应赔偿责任，主办方还可向参赛者追偿。

Legal expert Li Changqing warn that submitting AI-generated works to contests that explicitly prohibit them may constitute a breach of contract, allowing organizers to revoke awards and seek compensation if stipulated in the rules.

stipulate /ˈstɪpjuleɪt/ 规定

有媒体评论称，没有规矩不成方圆。对于AI技术的运用，相关行业或者各类比赛应及时建立规则，明确“AI辅助”与“AI生成”的界定标准与适用界限，与此同时，创作者也应对AI使用情况进行说明，明确的边界以及清晰透明的规则，才是避免争议的关键。

Commentators say the incident highlights the need for clearer standards distinguishing AI-assisted from AI-generated works, as well as greater transparency and disclosure requirements, to prevent similar disputes in the future.

对此，你怎么看？

来源：中国青年报 封面新闻 上游新闻 中国新闻周刊 法治日报

跟着China Daily

精读英语新闻

“无痛”学英语，每天20分钟就够！