11月1日雅思大作文示范写作 | 科技农业 VS 天然种植

扫码咨询2025年新航道秋季班

November 3, 2025

雅思作文真题直击 | | 栏目推送说明

每场雅思考试之后，第一时间分享本场考试雅思A类大作文的范文权威解析。欢迎每周锁定。

本期作者：张婷婷

2025年11月1日雅思大作文题目

Some people think that it is better to use scientific techniques to grow food, while others think that we should grow food naturally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

题目分析：这道题目属于典型双边讨论的议论文，写作任务必须三点俱全：

1. 科学种植方的论点与论据；

2. 自然种植方的论点与论据；

3. 作者明确立场：考生必须自己“定义”better：产量更高？环境更可持续？经济更可行？

关键词：

1. scientific techniques

显性含义：转基因(genetic modification), 化肥(chemical fertilizer), 农药(pesticide), 温室(greenhouse), 垂直农场(vertical farm)等。

隐性考点：效率(efficiency), 产量(yield), 抗风险(resilience), 生态副作用(externalities)。

2. grow food naturally

显性含义：有机(organic), 无农药(pesticide-free), 轮作(crop rotation), 农业生态学(agro-ecology), 再生农业(regenerative farming)。

隐性考点：食品安全(food safety), 生物多样性(biodiversity)、土壤健康(soil health)、文化与传统(heritage)。

范文及解析

Introduction

In recent decades, the debate over food farming methods has become increasingly contentious. While some individuals firmly advocate the use of scientific technologies, there are those who staunchly oppose it, insisting that naturally-grown crops are far more beneficial to human well-being and the environment.

解析

❖ contentious adj.有争议的，引起争论的；

❖ staunchly adv.坚定地；忠实地；

译文参考：

近几十年来，关于粮食种植方式的争议日益激烈。部分人士坚决主张运用科学技术，而另一些人则强烈反对，认为天然种植的作物对人类健康和环境更为有益。

Body paragraph 1

Proponents of scientific farming highlight its significant edge in terms of boosting output. High-yield crop varieties, developed through genetic modification, possess remarkable pest and drought resistance, which traditional crops, constrained by their natural genetic traits, rarely have. A prime example is hybrid rice, which has made a substantial contribution to addressing global food security challenges by greatly increasing yield compared to conventional inbred rice. In addition, hydroponics and vertical farming, two groundbreaking scientific methods, allow food to be grown in barren lands, which, in turn, diminishes the need for deforestation to expand farmland,thereby better protecting ecological equilibrium. For densely populated countries, these technologies are not merely convenient but necessary to feed expanding populations without further deforestation or environmental degradation.

解析

❖ proponents n. <正式> 支持者，建议者；

❖ boost v.使增长，推动；

❖ genetic modification基因改造、基因转变；

❖ constrain v.驱使；强迫；

❖ hybrid adj.混合的；杂交成的；

❖ substantial adj.大量的，价值巨大的；

❖ address v.处理，设法解决；

❖ hydroponics n.水栽培，水耕法；

❖ vertical farming 垂直农业；

❖ groundbreaking adj.开创性的；

❖ barren adj.贫瘠的，不毛的；不结果实的；

❖ equilibrium n.平衡，均衡；

译文参考：

科学种植的支持者强调其在提高产量方面的显著优势。通过基因改造培育的高产作物品种，具备传统作物因天然遗传特性所限而罕见的出色抗虫性与耐旱性。杂交水稻便是典型例证——相较于传统常规籼稻，其产量大幅提升，为应对全球粮食安全挑战作出了重要贡献。此外，水培法与垂直农业这两种创新性科学种植方式，能够在贫瘠土地上实现粮食种植，进而减少为扩大耕地而砍伐森林的需求，从而更好地维护生态平衡。对于人口稠密的国家而言，这些技术不仅便捷实用，更是在避免进一步砍伐森林或环境恶化的前提下，养活不断增长人口的必要举措。

Body paragraph 2

Opponents, conversely, argue that naturally-grown crops offer more tangible boons. They point out that organic agriculture avoids the use of artificial chemicals, which may leave toxic residues in food and contaminate soil and water sources. Traditional crop rotation, a practice that has been employed for centuries, preserves soil fertility without relying on synthetic additives. This eco-friendly approach is often unattainable in modern intensive farming, which heavily depends on chemical inputs. For consumers increasingly concerned about food safety and environmental impact, natural produce offers a more sustainable and healthy choice.

解析

❖ tangible adj.明确的，真实的；

❖ boon n.裨益，优势，有用的东西；

❖ residue n.剩余物，残留物；

❖ contaminate v.污染，弄脏；

❖ fertility n.肥沃，富饶；

❖ synthetic adj.合成的，人造的；

❖ additive n.添加剂，添加物；

❖ unattainable adj.做不到的；难到达的；

译文参考：

相反，反对者认为，天然种植的作物具有更为切实的益处。他们指出，有机农业不使用那些可能在食品中残留有毒物质，并污染土壤与水源的人工合成化学品。已有数百年应用历史的传统轮作制度，无需依赖合成添加剂即可维持土壤肥力。这种生态友好型种植方式，在严重依赖化学投入品的现代集约化农业中往往难以实现。对于日益关注食品安全与环境影响的消费者而言，天然农产品无疑是更具可持续性的健康之选。

Conclusion

In my opinion, neither extreme position is advisable. Scientific food production addresses the urgent need for quantity and efficiency, while natural farming ensures quality and environmental sustainability. A balanced approach that harnesses the strengths of both methods—supporting technological innovation alongside responsible organic practices—will best enable humanity to achieve food security without compromising the health of people or the planet.

解析

❖ harness v.控制并利用；连接，串联；

❖ innovation n.新事物，新方法；革新，创新；

❖ compromise v.妥协，让步；

译文参考：

在我个人看来，两种极端立场均不可取。科学化食品生产可满足对产量与效率的迫切需求，而天然种植则能保障产品质量与环境可持续性。因此，一种兼具两者优势的均衡路径——既支持技术创新，又倡导负责任的有机农业实践——方能最有效地助力人类实现粮食安全，同时不损害人类健康与地球生态。

如果你写雅思大作文时总是：开头卡壳、词穷写不满；写了很多篇，分数却卡在6分……老师真的理解你那种“很努力却提不上分”的焦虑。

秋季是提分关键期，新航道雅思课程重点针对：

拆透题型结构，写作有章可循；

真题练+逐句改，提升思路和表达；

积累词汇句型，摆脱机械套模板。

11/12月报名享专属优惠

别等到考前焦虑，扫码立刻咨询你的提分方案