普林斯顿研究 | 内陆和沿海水道如何影响气候

编者按

普林斯顿大学气候专家Laure Resplandy领导的研究详细说明了碳是如何储存在内陆和沿海水道中或通过这些水道运输的，这项研究对执行国际气候协议有着重大影响。

图源普林斯顿大学官网

“Streams to the river, river to the sea.” If only it were that simple.

Most global carbon-budgeting efforts assume a linear flow of water from the land to the sea, which ignores the complex interplay between streams, rivers, lakes, groundwater, estuaries, mangroves and more. A study co-led by climate scientist Laure Resplandy, an assistant professor of geosciences and the High Meadows Environmental Institute (HMEI) at Princeton University, details how carbon is stored and transported through the intricacy of inland and coastal waterways. Published in the current issue of the journal Nature, the work has significant implications for enforcing the carbon calculations that are part of international climate accords.

图源普林斯顿大学官网

Terrestrial and marine ecosystems have a powerful influence on climate by regulating the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).These ecosystems, however, are often viewed as disconnected from each other, which ignores the transfer of carbon from land to the open ocean through a complex network of water bodies — the continuum of streams, rivers, estuaries and other bodies carrying water from land to the sea.

In a detailed analysis, the team of researchers from Belgium, the United States and France discovered that this land-to-ocean aquatic continuum (LOAC) carries a substantial amount of carbon of anthropogenic (e.g., fossil-fuel) origin. Thus, the carbon removed from the atmosphere by terrestrial ecosystems is not all stored locally, as is commonly assumed, which has implications for global agreements that require countries to report their carbon inventories. The researchers also found that the land-to-ocean carbon transfer of natural origin was larger than previously thought, with far-reaching implications for the assessment of the anthropogenic CO2 uptake by the ocean and the land.

“The complexity of the LOAC, which includes rivers, groundwater, lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, tidal marshes, mangroves, seagrasses, and waters above continental shelves, has made it challenging to assess its influence on the global carbon cycle,” said Pierre Regnier, a professor at the University of Brussels who co-led the study with Resplandy.

Because of that complexity, important global carbon-budgeting efforts, such as those of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Global Carbon Project, typically assume a direct “pipeline” transfer of carbon from river mouths to the open ocean. Another common assumption is that all the transported carbon is natural, neglecting the impacts of human perturbations on this aquatic continuum, such as damming and the decimation of coastal vegetation.

In this study, the researchers synthesized more than 100 individual studies of the various components of the continuum. From this synthesis, LOAC carbon budgets were developed for two time periods: the pre-industrial period and the present day. Their results confirm the well-known pre-industrial carbon “loop” in which carbon is taken up from the atmosphere by terrestrial ecosystems, transferred by rivers to the ocean, and then outgassed back to the atmosphere.

“We find the amount of carbon carried by this natural land-to-ocean loop, 0.65 billion tons per year, is roughly 50% greater than previously thought,” Resplandy said.

Furthermore, this loop is comprised of two smaller loops, one that transfers carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to inland waters and another from coastal vegetation (so-called “blue carbon ecosystems”) to the open ocean.

“A larger pre-industrial land-to-ocean carbon transport implies that the ocean uptake of anthropogenic CO2 previously inferred from observations was underestimated,” Resplandy said.

“The flip side is that the land uptake of anthropogenic CO2 was overestimated,” added Regnier.

The study demonstrates thatanthropogenic carbon carried by rivers is either outgassed back to the atmosphere or eventually stored in aquatic sediments and the open ocean.

Philippe Ciais, a research director at the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement and a co-author of the study explained: “This new view of the anthropogenic CO2 budget may have a silver lining because sediments and the ocean offer arguably more stable repositories than terrestrial biomass and soil carbon, which are vulnerable to droughts, fires and land-use change.”

The researchers also have shown that humans have decreased the uptake of atmospheric CO2 from blue-carbon ecosystems by up to 50%. “If left unprotected from sea-level rise, pollution and coastal development, blue-carbon uptake of atmospheric CO2 will further decline and contribute to additional climate warming,” said Raymond Najjar, a professor from the Pennsylvania State University who also co-authored the study.

"The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle" by Pierre Regnier, Laure Resplandy, Raymond G. Najjar and Philippe Ciais, appears in the March 17 issue of the journal Nature (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04339-9). The work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie Sklodowska‐Curie grant 643052, C977 CASCADES, VERIFY 776810 and 725546, and 101003536 (ESM2025– Earth System Models for the Future)); Belgian Science Policy (ReCAP, FedTwin); the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Convergence Lab Changement climatique et usage des terres (CLAND); the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI RECCAP2 project 1190 (ESRIN/ 4000123002/18/I-NB); the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship; the Princeton Catalysis Initiative at Princeton University; NASA (the OCO‐ 2 Science Team Grant 80NSSC18K0893 and the Carbon Cycle Science and Interdisciplinary Science Programs; the National Science Foundation (Chemical Oceanography Program).

*文章转自普林斯顿大学官网

【点击进入京领国际学校大数据平台，

为孩子选择美好人生】

【京领服务】一键获取京领定制化服务

【品牌专栏】点击下方名校查看专辑

广东

其他

【京领家长圈】家长的圈子影响孩子的人生高度！和10万+家长一起，学习现代化国际教育理念和方法；与数百位牛爸牛妈畅聊教育；参与海内外专家学者的讲座。

【加入方式】长按复制ID：Kinglead-edu，或扫描上方二维码添加京领助手，申请加入。

【入群权益】同时您将免费获得定制化科研、升学方案，与藤校专家一对一交流的宝贵机会！

电话：010-82362348

微信：Kinglead-edu

京领排名

京领传媒

京领说

京领专访

京领报告

京领数据

京领研究

京领论坛

京领资源

专家学者资源库

海外大学资源库

海外中学资源库

行业人才资源库

国际学校资源库

国内大学资源库

京领服务

京领会员

藤校计划

高端实习

战略咨询

藤校科研

京领择校